Facebook Blocks Access to Graph Search During Privacy Firestorm

Facebook has checked access to a controversial component permitting searches of the vast substance inside the social network – a tool which raised privacy concerns but on the other hand was used for research and investigative journalism.

The main social network acknowledged for the current week it had “paused” some components of its “graph search,” a highlight introduced in 2013 which has started criticism for enabling posts and different content to be unearthed with a basic question.


Be that as it may, chart search turned out being a significant tool for researchers, rights activists, and journalists. It has been used to follow the activity of suspected war culprits and human traffickers and to screen extremists.

“We delayed a few parts of graph search late last week,” a Facebook representative said. “We’re in discussions with a couple of researchers to get familiar with more about how they used this device.”

Jennifer Grygiel, a Syracuse University teacher who pursues social media, states the move is the most recent to fix data access to Facebook since the scandal over Cambridge Analytica, the consultancy which captured personal data of a huge number of Facebook users.

The new check makes it harder for researchers to discover Facebook posts about topics going from war crimes to anorexia to the anti-vaccine development, Grygiel said.

Grygiel said while the move might be viewed as advancing privacy, it additionally limits the capacity of researchers to research Facebook itself and its efforts to get rid of hate speech and extremist substance.

“Researchers such as myself were using social charts to demonstrate how awful Facebook’s content moderation was,” she told AFP. “This might be a public relations move in the light of facts that Facebook is tired of having everybody understand how awful their privacy is.”

After being introduced in 2013, graph search drew prompt fire from privacy activists as a “frightening” tool that could allow stalking or undesirable disclosures.

Facebook has made tweaks over the years to chart search and offered users privacy settings constraining what information is unearthed. The company did not react to AFP questions to elaborate on the latest changes or the explanation behind the new policy.

Legitimate research or abuse?

“This device was used both for abusive purposes and for real research,” said Adi Kamdar, a legal fellow at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

Kamdar said Facebook’s turn might be troubling in view of Facebook’s ongoing “block of good-faith journalism and research on the stage.”

The Knight Institute this week sent a letter to Facebook marked by somewhere in the range of 200 journalists and researchers approachingĀ the informal community for improved access to study the platform.

“Digital research and journalism serve the public interest by propelling public understanding of the social media platforms,” the letter said.

“These platforms – and Facebook’s specifically – have a powerful yet poorly understood influence on public discourse and, by extension, on societies around the world.”

The letter asked Facebook to create a “sheltered harbor” for specific researchers and journalists that “would allow us to do our work without hindering Facebook’s ability to secure the privacy of its users and the integrity of its platform.”

Kamdar said the letter was drafted before Facebook’s most recent change and that the new checks “may be viewed as a setback” for research, for instance, on how Facebook’s algorithms and proposals work.

Investigative journalist Michael Hayden of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which screens right-wing extremist teams, expressed worry over whether the tweak could limit the capacity to track hate speech and violent activity on Facebook.

“It’s important to remember that these users, for the most part, need whatever a number of people to consider their content as possible,” Hayden said. “The greater concern would be if these tweaks empowered them to organize in secret on the platform. This would especially concern me with people who plot violence and terrorism.”

Also Read:

Casey Fiesler, a University of Colorado professor and social computing researcher, state Facebook should not shut off access to its data for research, however, should be particular.

“Any tool that people use to assemble data can be used for positive or negative purposes,” Fiesler said.

“I would prefer to see moral decisions be made about a specific use of data instead of to close it down entirely.”